Casey Luskin: Addicted to Powerful Hallucinogens?
This actually makes me angry.
Today I read a blog post by Casey Luskins in which he lies his creationist titty ass off. As I’ve said before, Win Ben Stein’s Integrity makes fun of Richard Dawkins for saying that the only way Intelligent Design could be true is if space aliens, who themselves had evolved, had seeded earth with the first life.
Dawkins responded to this ridicule with an op-ed, saying basically what I said before, only better.
Now that the truth is out there, Luskin tries to deny, or at least de-emphasize, the the things his colleagues have said. How does he try to prove that Dawkins is wrong? He googles a phrase from Dawkins’ op-ed, “For all we know, the designer might be an alien from outer space.” With quotes around it. Let me repeat that. WITH QUOTES AROUND IT!!!!
I can’t include a picture of Luskin in this post, because I am at work, and Luskin is A GIANT EMEFFING TIT.
Luskin thinks it’s telling that he only gets one search result for his query. But Dawkins wasn’t quoting anyone specifically. He was merely showing the kind of thing ID proponents say!
The truth is that ID proponents often say things like that. Especially William Dembski. They have to, otherwise they’d be confused for creationists (they are). What can I do when I catch someone is such an outright blatant lie? All I can do is tell you people. And email Casey.
Casey,
In the blog post [in the subject line], you clearly misrepresent the truth, or you just don’t know how to use Google. In any case, you should probably watch this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
=6j_SD1EgcUI Or read this: http://www.discovery.org/a/1283
Or read Dembski’s The Design Inference.
Or stop lying.
–
Jason J Brunet
There was another option I didn’t suggest because I didn’t want to be considered part of the The Machine. And that option is to shut the hell up.
Edit: Casey responded to my email, and actually called me out for accusing him of lying, as it is a serious thing. And he’s right. I apologized to him by email, and even though I don’t think he’s read this post, I am apologizing here for the things I said about him in this post and in the comments. I don’t think it would be right to take it down, since I said it and have to own up to it. But from now on I will be endeavoring NOT to make fun of him. But I still do think he’s wrong and have more than an inkling that he’s not being completely honest.








April 28th, 2008 at 10:49 am
Hey, Jason, some news: the Amish no longer live on large compounds/farms.
I Googled it with quotes around it (”the Amish live in big compounds/farms”), so it must be a fact.
This is a whole new way to deny the existence of things that make me uncomfortable to think about!
April 28th, 2008 at 10:53 am
No results found for “casey luskin always tells the truth”.
Well, I guess that settles it.
April 28th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
Au contraire’, I just did a search on “No results found for “casey luskin always tells the truth”.” and that didn’t come up with results either. At this time, I think I have completely destroyed your argument QED.
April 28th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
Oh, and another thing. Casey claims that a well known atheist supports ID. However, Antony Flew is actually a deist and has been since 2004. In fact, PZ Myers wrote an entry about it: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/11/roy_varghese_and_the_exploitat.php
That’s kinda like lying. If anything, it’s a distortion of the truth.
April 29th, 2008 at 2:10 pm
I was actually talking to Jason about this offline… it could be that this dude is just willfully ignorant. Which is worse?
May 1st, 2008 at 1:20 pm
[…] Casey Luskin did return my email. He said he’d been travelling, hence the delay. I won’t post it, since I haven’t asked for permission and he is quite polite and gentle. In a nutshell, he claims I misunderstood him. He was only trying to rebut Dawkins’ claim that ID proponents only (Luskin’s word) mention God as the Designer in private. Now, maybe, since I apparently have a history of misunderstanding, I’m also misunderstanding Dawkins, because I can’t find where his article says that. […]